检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津大学建工学院,300072
出 处:《建筑结构》2004年第9期60-62,27,共4页Building Structure
摘 要:对国内外的试验资料进行了研究分析 ,对有代表性的砌体抗压强度计算模式不定性进行了比较。结果显示 ,我国砌体设计规范的砌体抗压强度计算模式对于抗压强度较高的烧结普通砖、烧结多孔砖砌体安全储备偏大。并对规范设计计算公式、计算模式不定性的考虑以及公式局部限制条件等提出了补充建议。供我国砌体结构设计与施工规范的修订时参考。Through analysis on the data collected from published experimental results, the uncertainty in several models proposed in the literature for prediction of masonry compressive strength are studied. Furthermore, where possible, models suggested in representative design codes are also examined in the same manner. It is found that the Chinese code for design of masonry structures(GB50003—2001) of proposed models is most suitable and foreign existing models give highly uncertain values of the compressive strength, whereas foreign code values are uncertain as well as perhaps over-conservative. Incorporation of a model uncertainty factor is also achieved.
关 键 词:砌体结构 不定性 抗压强度 砖砌体 计算模式 烧结普通砖 烧结多孔砖 中国 国内外 规范
分 类 号:TU522[建筑科学—建筑技术科学] TU364
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249