检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡朝阳[1] 甘德强[1] 韩祯祥[1] Deb Chattopadhyay
机构地区:[1]浙江大学电气工程学院,浙江省杭州市310027 [2]查尔斯河咨询公司亚洲分部
出 处:《电力系统自动化》2004年第20期1-6,11,共7页Automation of Electric Power Systems
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金青年人才培养项目(R503198)~~
摘 要:尝试运用基于合作博弈的成本分摊理论来分摊机组启动费用。研究了机组启动费用分摊的核的存在性问题,并指出该分摊不一定是凸博弈。分析了核仁分摊法和Shapley值分摊法的特点和适用范围,对比了两者的优缺点。此外,对机组空载费用的分摊问题也进行了有益的探索。文中提出采用分时段分摊法和整体分摊法两种方法来分摊多时段的机组启动费用,并对比研究了两者的分摊结果。所提出的分摊方法与现有方法相比,在分摊合理性和公平性方面存在理论上的优势。数值算例结果表明,提出的分摊方法是公平、有效的。Cooperative game theory is applied to allocating unit start-up costs among loads. The existence conditions of core allocation are studied with the conclusion that the allocation problem is not always a convex game drawn. Based on the concepts of nucleolus and Shapley value, the start-up costs are allotted to each load. The advantages and shortcomings of the two methods are examined. The allocation of unit no-load costs is also studied. Then multi-period start-up cost allocation problem is studied, and two methods are suggested. In the first method, multi-period start-up cost is allocated based on the allocation outcome of single-period allocation, while in the second method multi-period start-up cost of a trading day is allocated as a whole. The allocation results are compared. Contrasted with existing methods, the suggested allocation methods have theoretical advantage in assurance of equity and rationality. It is believed that the proposed methods for allocation of unit startup costs are equitable and can be potentially useful.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249