检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省电力公司技术中心,江苏南京210036 [2]浙江大学电气工程学院,浙江杭州310027
出 处:《华东电力》2004年第10期7-10,共4页East China Electric Power
摘 要:引入实验经济学方法 ,探讨了电力报价实验的设计思路 ,考察对及价模式对市场电价水平的影响。并通过模拟实验仿真的方法对系统边际价格拍卖 (MCP)和按报价价格拍卖 (PAB)两种模式进行了比较 ,实验数据表明PAB模式并不能带来总平均电价的降低 ,电价水平的高低由市场竞争状态而定。The study method of experimental economics was introduced and the designing of the electricity price bidding experiments was discussed,as well as the effect of bidding model on electricity price in the market.Through experiment simulation the two models of Market Clearing price (MCP) and the Pay As Bid(PAB) were compared.The experimental data showed that the PAB model can not reduce the general average price which is determined by the competition in the market.The application of experimental economics to the electric power market was prospected in the end.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145