检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永辉[1] 张颖[1] 魏正专[1] 徐文晖[1] 黄先恩[1] 宫念樵[1] 夏穗生[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属医院器官移植研究所,湖北武汉430030
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2004年第20期48-50,共3页China Journal of Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的应用显微外科技术,对腹部多器官移植的不同术式进行比较研究。方法60只SD大鼠,随机分成A,B,C三组,分别行不同术式的多器官移植手术,对手术的难易程度、成功率、术后生存率及并发症的发生率等进行比较。结果A组手术成功率为40%,B组为50%,C组为80%。C组与A组或B组的比较效果显著(P <0.05)。术后1周生存率A,B,C组分别为50%(2/4),60%(3/5)和75%(6/8)。C组较A组和B组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论C组术式行腹部多器官移植效果较好。Objective: To study the different operation style and the techniques in the abdominal multivisceral transplantation, by using microsurgical techniques. Methods: 60 SD rats were divided randomly into A, B and C groups. In each group, the abdominal multivisceral transplantation was performed in its own way. The difficulties of the operations, the success rates of the operation, the survival and the complications after the operation were compared among the groups. Results: In group C, the success rate of the operation is 80% compared with 40% of the group A and 50% of group B (P <0.05). The survival rates after one week of the operation in group A, B and C were respectively 50% (2/4), 60% (3/5) and 75% (6/8). Conclusion: The operation method in group C is better than the method being used in group A and group B.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15