论未来我国民法典中物权请求权制度的定位  

On the Arrangement of Claims in Rem in Future Civil Code of China

作　　者：程啸[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2004年第5期49-56,共8页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：未来我国民法典不应将物权请求权制度规定在物权法总则当中,而应采取德国民法典的模式,即在“所有权”一章规定基于所有权产生的各类物权请求权,至于其他物权人所享有的物权请求权,应依据该他物权之特点在相应的各章作出援引性的规定。因为在他物权当中,地役权人与留置权人只享有排除妨害请求权与预防妨害请求权,抵押权人则不享有任何物权请求权。The institution of claims in rem (dinglicher Anspruch) shouldn't be placed in the part of general provisions of property law in the future Civil Code of China instead of taking the mode in Germany Civil Code (BGB), that is, providing rules covering all kinds of claims in rein arising out of ownership in the chapter of 'ownership' and making citable arrangements concerning the claims in rem of other persons who may hold ownership's interests based on such interests' characteristics in respective chapters, The reason lies in that a holder of real servitudes or a lienor can only have the claim for removal and injunction while a mortgagee doesn't possess any claims in rem.

关 键 词：物权请求权 所有物返还请求权 排除妨害请求权 预防妨害请求权 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]