检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄杰[1] 尤春景[1] 彭军[1] 岳翔[1] 高春华[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院康复医学科,武汉430030
出 处:《中华物理医学与康复杂志》2004年第10期618-620,共3页Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
摘 要:目的 探讨腰椎间盘突出症患者采用McKenzie技术治疗后出现症状的向心化现象与疗效的关系。方法 腰椎间盘突出症患者 60例 ,采用Mckenzie技术治疗 ,治疗前、后采用目测类比评分法 (VAS)、直腿抬高试验、脊柱伸展活动度等指标进行评定 ,并观察是否出现症状向心化现象。结果 出现症状向心化现象者 40例 ,其VAS、治疗时间等指标数值与无症状向心化现象者 2 0例比较 ,差异均有统计学意义 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 在腰椎间盘突出症治疗中出现症状向心化现象提示疗效较好 ,向心化现象是评估腰椎间盘突出症疗效的敏感指标之一。Objective To investigate the relationship between prognosis and centralization of symptoms in patients with lumbar disc prolapse treated with the McKenzie technique. Methods Sixty patients were recruited for this study. All the subjects were treated with the McKenzie technique once daily, and were assessed at entry to and discharge from this study by use of such parameters as the time of centralization, VAS scores, straight-leg-raising test and the extension mobility of the spine. Results Forty patients demonstrated centralization of symptoms, while the other 20 patients did not. There were significant differences between those with and those without centralization of symptoms with regard to the VAS scores and treatment time (P<0.01). Conclusion In the treatment of patients with the lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse, the centralization of symptoms was a sensitive and reliable indication of a better prognosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28