"剑桥资本争论"与新古典边际分配论质疑  

Query about Cambridge Capital Argument and Neoclassical Marginal Distribution Theory

作　　者：王璐[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济研究所,天津300071

出　　处：《河北经贸大学学报》2004年第5期11-20,共10页Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business

摘　　要：目前位居现代主流经济学地位的新古典边际生产力分配理论,由于完全排除了特定经济制度和资本 主义经济关系的研究框架,以至在与新剑桥学派发起的"剑桥资本争论"中不断以逻辑悖论形式公诸于众;从 而表明,真正的收入分配理论须联系到现实的资本主义经济关系这一竞争经济的研究框架。Since it completely rules out the research structure about specific economic system and capitalistic economic relationships, neoclassic marginal productivity theory, taking the leading position of modern economics, is frequently made public in the form of logical paradox in 'Cambridge capital argument' launched by new Cambridge school. Therefore, the research structure for competitive economy should be that the real income distribution theory has to connect with actual capitalist economic relationships.

关 键 词：主流经济学 “剑桥资本争论” 边际生产力分配论 新古典经济理论 

分 类 号：F091.348.1[经济管理—政治经济学]