检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈欣新[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所
出 处:《法学研究》2000年第4期140-151,共12页Chinese Journal of Law
摘 要:在香港基本法的设计中 ,中央与香港均拥有基本法解释权及审查权。如果两者不能在权限、管辖、程序及释义方面达成一定的默契 ,就会引发宪制危机。本文在分析两地法治传统和宪制模式的差异以及香港基本法对“违宪审查权”的制度设计后 ,提出中央和香港应本着相互理解和宽容的原则 ,按照中国宪法体制与英美法制传统相结合的思路 ,在基本法所设计的中央与特区分权的制度框架内进行协调 ,以避免和化解这种冲突。Since Hong Kong returns to China, people focus on the problem that the difference between Hong Kong and Mainland may lead to constitutional crisis. According to the Hong Kong Basic Law, both the Center and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Zone has the interpretative power and the constitutional review power on the basic law.If they can not make contract about the power limitation,jurisdiction,proce dure and interpretation,the constitutional crisis may break out.After analysis the difference of legal tradition and constitutional modal between Hong Kong and Mainland and“ the constitutional review” system of the basic law,this article points out that the Center ane the Hong Kong Special Administrative Zone should understand and tolerate each other. The legal coordination should be on the basis of separate power system of the basic law and combine both Chinese constitutional system and legal tradition of common law so as to avoid and solute such serious legal conflict.
关 键 词:香港基本法 中央 违宪审查权 英美法 审查权 中国宪法 管辖 协调 化解 制度框架
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D925[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.7.155