汪精卫、梁启超“革命”论战的政治学背景  

The Theoretic Foundation of the Debates about “Revolution” between Wang Jingwei and Liang Qichao

作　　者：孙宏云[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学历史系,副教授510275

出　　处：《历史研究》2004年第5期69-83,共15页Historical Research

摘　　要：在清末立宪派与革命派论战中 ,汪精卫、梁启超围绕“种族革命”与“政治革命”的论战所援引的论点均以伯伦知理、波伦哈克以及笕克彦等人的学说为学理依据 ,只是双方各有偏重取舍而已。虽然表面上汪、梁均重视学理依据 ,但二人同为政论家 ,在理想与学问之间 ,都以理想为本位 ,有意无意之中 ,取学问为工具 ,论点开道 ,学说殿后 ,以致于漏洞百出 ,彼此相互攻击。通过观察清末政论的政治学背景 ,可以深入认识清末政治思想的一些本相。In the late Qing debates between the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries,Wang Jingwei who advocated “racial revolution” and Liang Qichao who called for “political revolution” both drew on J.K.Bluntschli and Conrad Bornhak as their theoretical foundation,although they took different elements from the theories of these writers.As political actors,Wang and Liang paid more attention to ideology than to scholarship despite their seeming emphasis on theory.Scholarship was often no more than a tool to support their statements.It is not surprising,therefore,that their statements were often inadequate and open to question.A survey of the political science theories that underpinned political ideas in the late Qing dynasty may cast more light on these ideas.

关 键 词：汪精卫 梁启超 立宪派 革命派 政治思想 《国家学》 

分 类 号：K257[历史地理—历史学]