检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南大学中国古典文学研究所 [2]河南大学文学院
出 处:《文学遗产》2004年第6期104-110,共7页
摘 要:署名彭孙的《词统源流》、《词藻》和署名李良年的《词坛纪事》、《词家辨证》四部词话的真伪以及它们与徐《词苑丛谈》之间的关系一直是个悬案。唐圭璋先生曾指出四部词话乃书商由《词苑丛谈》中割裂而成的伪作 ,王熙元先生则持相反的观点。本文通过对《词苑丛谈》和《词统源流》等四部词话的考辨 ,进一步证实了唐圭璋先生的论断。The Falsehood or not of four books of ci-poetic notes by names of Ci Tong Yuan Liu (The Sources of Ci-poetic tradition), Ci Zao (Ci-poetical Words),all signed by the name of Peng Sunyu(彭孙), and Ci Tan Ji Shi (Anecdotes of Ci-poetic Circles), Ci Jia Bian Zheng (Dialectical Discourses of Ci-poets), all signed by the name of Li Liangnian (李良年), and their relationship with Ci Yuan Cong Tan (Talks about Ci-poetic Circles) written by Xu Qiu (徐NFDC8), have always been questionable. Mr. Tang Guizhang (唐圭璋) has pointed out that these four books of ci-poetic notes, being lifted from Ci Yuan Cong Tan, were faked or falsified by the booksellers. However, Mr. Wang Xiyuan (王熙元) has taken an opposite viewpoint. This text makes true Mr. Tang’s judgment by further examining these four books of ci-poetic notes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43