处理医疗侵权纠纷需要解决的几个认识问题  

Several Concept Questions of Dealing with the Medical Tort Dissension

作　　者：王月霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学,山东济南250100

出　　处：《中国卫生事业管理》2002年第8期482-484,共3页Chinese Health Service Management

摘　　要：新《医疗事故处理条例》扩大了医疗事故的范围 ,采用了广义医疗事故之概念。对此 ,一部分人认为医疗侵权就是指医疗事故。其实 ,医疗事故是不等同于医疗侵权的 ,二者是两个不同的法律事实。在认定医疗侵权时应特别注意医疗侵权与医疗事故的区别 ,切忌受医疗事故概念的影响 ,用医疗事故的构成要件来分析判断医疗侵权 ,同时还要注意医疗侵权与“与医疗行为有关的侵权行为”的区别 ,以求达到正确认定医疗侵权 。New Regulation of Malpractice enlarges the scope of malpractice, which adopts its generalized concept. Therefore, some people think that medical tort is equal to malpractice. In fact, Medical tort and malpractice are two different law facts. In the course of identifying medical tort, we should pay attention to the difference between medical tort and malpractice, and are not affected by malpractice concept to judge and analyze medical tort according to the elements of malpractice. Meanwhile, we should distinguish medical tort from tort-related medical behavior to correctly identify medical tort and apply law regulation of upside-down onus probandi.

关 键 词：侵权纠纷 医疗事故 医疗行为 举证责任倒置 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]