检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康民军[1]
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学历史系,100089
出 处:《当代中国史研究》2004年第6期52-63,共12页Contemporary China History Studies
摘 要:195 4年中印协定是 2 0世纪五六十年代中印边界争端中双方争论的一个焦点。当时的印度政府认为 ,195 4年中印协定解决了中印之间包括边界在内的所有悬而未决的问题 ,是其主张的中印边界中段的条约依据 ,和平共处五项原则写入协定表明中国确认了印度政府主张的中印边界。中国政府认为 ,195 4年中印协定和写入其中的和平共处五项原则与中印边界无关 ,更不能表明中国承认了印度主张的任何一段中印边界。中国政府的观点是符合历史事实的。印度政府坚持上述主张及其拒绝续签 195 4年中印协定的做法 ,只是为了把其主张的中印边界强加给中国 。The Sino-Indian Agreement signed in 1954 was a point at issue in the Sino-Indian border dispute in the 1950s and 1960s. The Indian government argued that this Agreement solved all the outstanding issues between the two countries, including the border dispute. In its view, the Agreement constituted the treaty basis for the boundary it had advocated in the middle sector and the inclusion of the five principles of peaceful coexistence in the Agreement was a proof that the Chinese government endorsed the Indian stand. The Chinese government held, on the other hand, that the 1954 Agreement and the inclusion of the five principles in it had nothing to do with the question of Sino-Indian border, still less to indicate China's recognition of the Indian-proposed boundary in any section. The views of the Chinese government tally with historical facts. The Indian government's stand and its refusal to renew the 1954 Sino-Indian Agreement were designed to impose the boundary it stood for on China, which seriously impaired the relations between the two countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249