检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨宇冠[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学
出 处:《中国法学》2003年第1期130-137,共8页China Legal Science
摘 要:本文阐述了联合国人权公约中“不强迫自证其罪”规定的意义 ,分析了强迫自证其罪的构成 ,提出强迫自证其罪的法律后果分为 :国家责任、实施者责任和取得证据的排除。文章分析了目前在我国确立不强迫自证其罪原则的困难 ,同时也指出了这方面存在的有利条件。作者认为 ,在我国确立不强迫自证其罪原则不能一步到位 ,而需要逐步实现 ,并就此提出了具体的设想。The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights recognizes that everyone charged with a criminal offence shall not be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt. This paper makes a comparative study on this clause and other relevant concepts, such as the right to silence, voluntary statement and the right against self-incrimination. The paper analyses conducts constituting 'compelling', especially torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; points out that the legal consequences of such 'compelling' should be met by the government, the perpetrator and the evidence obtained with the illegal means should be excluded; indicates that China has not yet incorporated this right, however, China has made great progress on the aspect. Finally, the author suggests the necessary steps China might take, in accordance with its laws and realities, to adopt legislative or other measures to give effect to the right recognized in the international human rights treaties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15