检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆第三军医大学西南医院风湿科,400038 [2]重庆市血液中心,400015
出 处:《中国误诊学杂志》2004年第8期1185-1187,共3页Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
摘 要:目的 :探讨不同 HL A- B2 7检测方法之间的差异及各自的优缺点 ,为临床检验提供参考。方法 :分别采用微量淋巴细胞毒法及流式细胞仪法检测 134例血标本的 HL A- B2 7抗原 ,将两者结果进行比较分析。结果 :两种检测方法结果符合率为 94 .8%。微量淋巴细胞毒法检测强直性脊柱炎者 HL A- B2 7阳性率为 89.5 % ,对照组阳性率 11.0 % ,符合国内外大样本调查结果。结论 :两种检测方法均准确可靠 ,适合于有条件的医院开展。Objective:To discuss the difference and characteristics of two HLA-B27 testing methods,which can offer references for clinical testing. Methods: Microlymphocytotoxicity Test and Flow Cytometry were adopted to test HLA-B27 antigen in 134 samples and the following results were compared and analysed.Results:The accordance rate is 94.8% in two methods. B27-positive samples by Microlymphocyto-toxicity Test is 89.5% in patients with ankylosing spondylitis(AS) and 11.0% in control,which is accorded with the results of large-sample investigation.Conclusion:The two methods are both accurate and stable,which are adapted to the hospital with the instruments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7