中国行政指导的司法救济  

Judicial Remedy for Administrative Guidance

作　　者：王士如[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学法学院,上海200000

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2004年第4期49-54,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：从人权保障、权力监督和依法行政的角度出发 ,如果行政指导行为使行政相对人受到损害 ,相对人有权获得司法救济。可以借助合同法上的要约与承诺理论 ,来分析在指导过程中行政机关和相对人的权利义务关系。应根据行政指导的合法性、强制性 ,行政机关是否履行其承诺的义务 ,相对人可以自由选择接受指导与否、是否有寻求救济的其他途径等因素 ,区别行政指导的具体性质 ,为相对人确定相应的救济手段。From the perspective of protecting human rights, supervising powers and administration according to law, the private party should have the right to bring a suit when his rights were infringed upon We can analyze the legal relations between administrative agencies and private parties in the process of administrative guidance with reference to the theory of offer and promise in the contract law Several factors should be considered such as the legality and compulsoriness of the administrative guidance when we distinguish the nature of an administrative guidance and provide remedies for the private party

关 键 词：行政指导行为 司法救济 行政机关 权利义务关系 行政相对人 人权保障 合同法 要约 承诺 权力监督 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]