检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董全民[1] 马玉寿[2] 李青云[2] 赵新全[1] 王启基[1] 施建军[2]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院西北高原生物研究所,西宁810001 [2]青海省畜牧兽医科学院,西宁810003
出 处:《西北植物学报》2005年第1期94-102,共9页Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica
基 金:青海省 九五 攻关项目 96-N-112 ;国家 十五 攻关项目 2001BA606A-05
摘 要:两年的牦牛放牧试验结果表明:在暖季草场,随着放牧率的提高,禾草和莎草类功能群的盖度、生物量及其组成与高度减小,它们与放牧率呈显著的负相关 P<0.05 可食杂草和毒杂草类功能群的盖度、生物量及其组成与高度增加,它们与放牧率呈显著的正相关 P<0.05 各功能群的盖度与生物量之间是显著的正相关关系 P<0.05 .对照草地由于没有牦牛的采食,群落由少数优势种植物所统治,群落结构趋于简单,物种组成贫乏,物种多样性和均匀度指数最小;轻度放牧牦牛选择采食对植物群落的影响较小,群落的物种丰富度指数、均匀度指数和多样性指数均不高;中度放牧提高了资源的利用效率,增加了群落结构的复杂性,草地的物种丰富度指数、均匀度指数和多样性指数均最高,该结果支持 中度干扰理论 ;重度放牧由于牦牛采食过于频繁,改变了植物的竞争能力,导致植物种的均匀度下降,多样性减少.不同放牧率草地群落的物种数 S 、丰富度指数 Ma 、多样性指数 Shan-non-Wiener指数H′和Simpson指数D 、均匀度指数 Pielow指数J′ 的排序为:对照<轻度放牧<重度放牧<中度放牧,优势度指数 Berger-Parke指数 的变化趋势则与之相反.Effects of stocking rates for yak on community composition in K.parva alpine meadow had been studied for two years.The results showed:in warm-season pasture,with the increase of stocking rates,coverage,average height,aboveground and its percentage composition for functional groups of grasses and sedges decreased,and they were significantly and negatively correlated with stocking rates (P<0.05),and on the contrary,functional groups of palatable and toxic weeds increased,and they had a positively correlation with stocking rates (P<0.05).Besides,there was a significant and positive correlation between coverage and aboveground biomass of different functional groups (P<0.05).As for control grassland,the community dominated by a few plants,structure of that was simple and lack of species,which led to species richness,diversity and evenness index were minimum for grassland not grazed and ingested,and under light grazing,the influences of ingestion by yaks on plant community were very small,which caused species richness,diversity and evenness index were not high.However,moderate grazing increased utilizing efficiency of resources and complexity of plant community,and so species richness,diversity and evenness index were maximum,which supported 'hypothesis of intermediate disturbance',heavy grazing accompanying with frequent ingestion and serious influence on plant community,resulted in a low evenness,richness and diversity index.The order of species number (S),richness index (Ma),diversity index (Shannon-Wiener index H′ and Simpson index D),evenness index (Pielow index J′) under different stocking rates was:control<light grazing<heavy grazing<moderate grazing,but dominance index (Berger-Parke index Ⅰ) was contrary with them in order.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28