医疗事故技术鉴定结论差异的分析及启示  

Analysis of and inspiration from differences in technical appraisals of malpractice

作　　者：王芳 刘海英 常晓燕 蔡执敏 李贤仁[2] 刘理燕 

机构地区：[1]北京医学会,100036 [2]武警总医院

出　　处：《中华医院管理杂志》2004年第12期728-731,共4页Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration

摘　　要：医疗事故技术鉴定实行多次鉴定制 ,各次鉴定结论是卫生行政部门、司法机关处理医疗纠纷的重要依据和证据 ,具有法律证明效力。通过对结论差异案例的原因分析 ,提出正确理解和准确把握医疗事故定义是正确判定医疗事故的关键和核心 ;恰当地运用举证责任分配原则是医疗事故技术鉴定的重要环节 ;完善《医疗事故处理条例》、《医疗事故分级标准》、《医疗事故技术鉴定暂行办法》是鉴定结论准确、公正的基础 ;准确地把握法律法规的主旨 。The adoption of the system of multi-technical appraisals of malpractice means that the appraisals made each time, which constitute the key basis and evidence for the health administrative departments and the judicial organs to deal with medical disputes, are of legal validity as proof. By analyzing the causes of the differences in the appraisals of certain cases, the authors argue that a correct understanding of the definition of malpractice is the key to a correct determination of it; an appropriate application of the principle of allocating the burden of proof is the key link in the technical appraisal of malpractice; perfection of Regulations on Handling Malpractice, Standards for the Classification of Malpractices, and Temporary Provisions on the Technical Appraisal of Malpractice is the basis of correct and impartial appraisals; and a good grasp of the gist of rules and regulations and appraisal according to law is the guarantee for a correct determination of the nature of malpractices.

关 键 词：《医疗事故技术鉴定暂行办法》 鉴定结论 举证责任分配 司法机关 效力 准确把握 证据 医疗纠纷 卫生行政部门 《医疗事故处理条例》 

分 类 号：D919.4[医药卫生—法医学]