检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄婷婷[1] 曹慧[1] 王兴祥[2] 崔中利[1,3]
机构地区:[1]南京农业大学农业部环境微生物工程重点开放实验室 [2]中国科学院南京土壤研究所 [3]中国科学院南京土壤研究所南京210008
出 处:《土壤》2004年第6期662-666,共5页Soils
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(40371069);中国博士后科学基金项目(2003033495);中国科学院创新项目( KZCX3-SW-417)资助。
摘 要:获得高浓度、大片段、多样性程度高的土壤微生物总DNA 是研究土壤微生物群落结构的分子生态学基础。本文采用间接法(菌体细胞回收法)提取红壤地区两种土壤类型的土壤微生物总DNA,定量计算其回收率,并与直接法(细胞原位裂解法)比较了提取效率和纯度。结果表明:红壤地区2种土壤每克干土的总DNA提取量,间接法约为0.34和0.53礸/g干土,直接法约为13.62和24.32礸/g干土;间接法的提取效率低于直接法,但所得DNA片段较大,且Sau 3AⅠ 酶切和16 S rDNA通用引物PCR扩增结果显示,间接法比直接法更能有效地去除土壤中的某些抑制剂,所得总DNA的纯度更高,有利于后续操作。Isolation of DNA sufficient in purity, large in fragment and high in diversity from natural environments is the basis for molecular ecology study on community structure. In this study, the authors chose an indirect method, which is the cell recovery method, to extract DNA from two distinct red soils in South China, calculate its recovery efficiency and compare with the direct method in DNA yield and purity. The results show that the crude DNA yields from the two soils were about 0.34 and 0.53礸/g by the indirect method and 13.62礸, and 24.32礸/g dried soil by the direct method respectively. Although the indirect DNA extraction method recovered smaller amounts of total DNA than the direct method, the DNA fragments are larger in size. Moreover, the results of Sau3AⅠenzyme digestion and PCR amplification in evaluating DNA purity demonstrate that the indirect method can delete some inhibitor more efficiently, yielding DNA of superior quality more suitable for follow-up procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117