中小铜管盘拉配模规程两种计算方法比较  被引量:3

Comparison between Two Calculation Methods for Arranging Dies for Drawing Small and Medium Sized Copper Coils

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:周宜淼 周紫箭 

机构地区:[1]江苏省冶金研究所,江苏南京210007 [2]古河金属(无锡)有限公司,江苏无锡214028

出  处:《上海有色金属》2004年第4期163-167,共5页Shanghai Nonferrous Metals

摘  要:通过两个实例,计算表明K计算法和径差法均是可行的;两者在Di和Si两组数列中,道次最大相对差异为2 52%。但前者计算简便,所需已知数据少,并且具有灵活性,能适应较为复杂多变的实际生产情况。所推荐的K计算法,也适用于编制板带材轧制压下规程。Both K calculation method and diameter difference calculation method are proven feasible through their applications to two cases. It is found that in regard to two different groups of figures ( Di and Si ), the maximum pass reduction difference between the calculated figures of the two methods is 252%. The former method is simpler and requires less data. Besides, it is more flexible and compatible with concrete complicated and changing conditions for production.Therefore, K calculation method is to be preferred. It is also applicable to the compilation of rolling schedules for strip and sheet.

关 键 词:相对差异 生产情况 中小 最大 压下规程 编制 计算方法 板带材轧制 铜管 计算法 

分 类 号:TG356[金属学及工艺—金属压力加工]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象