主权让渡的法律涵义三辨  

Three Points of the Legal Meanings of Transfer of Sovereignty

作　　者：张军旗[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学法学院,上海200433

出　　处：《现代法学》2005年第1期98-102,共5页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"WTO与国家主权"(项目批准号:02CFX017)的成果之一。

摘　　要：当要强调国际组织在某些事项上获得对成员国的控制力和支配性时,主权让渡应表述为“主权权力”的让渡;当要强调国际组织由成员国的让渡行为而获得了某种排他的能力和资格时,主权让渡则应表述为“主权权利”的让渡。类似于基本权利和派生权利的区分难以适当地解释主权权利的让渡。在国家让渡了越来越多主权权利的情况下,代表主权的是终极支配权,而不是所谓基本权利。Where one indicates that an international organization obtains certain control or domination over its member states, transfer of sovereignty should be expressed as transfer of 'sovereign powers'. Where one indicates that an international organization has got certain exclusive abilities and qualification from its member states' transfer, transfer of sovereignty should be expressed as transfer of 'sovereign rights'. It is hard to explain appropriately the transfer of sovereign rights only by making a distinction between basic rights and derivative rights. In the case that sovereign states have transferred more and more sovereign rights, it is the final dominating right and not the so- called basic rights that represents sovereignty.

关 键 词：主权让渡 主权权利 基本权利 法律涵义 国际组织 支配权 代表 成员国 控制力 事项 

分 类 号：D992[政治法律—国际法学] D997[政治法律—法学]