检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张锡厚[1]
出 处:《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2005年第1期84-87,共4页Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:《敦煌诗集残卷辑考》曾受到学界和唐诗研究者的广泛关注和赞誉 ,但辑考者忽略了整理敦煌诗歌最基础的文字要求 ,在录校文字时或审慎不周 ,或曲解诗意 ,抑或未加考辨 ,使某些明白易懂的诗句被录校得面目全非 ,如“李陵台”写作“高□台” ,“汗马”写成“汀马” ,“平原客”写作“平桌艹各” ,“诸佛”写为“论佛” ,“奉佛”为“来佛”Whereas An Archaeological Study of Dunhuang Poetry has attracted scholars and researchers of Tang poems, the author of the paper, however, discovers quite a few kinds of mistakes in the work due to carelessness, misunderstanding, or failure to attest. In effect, what should be easy to understand has become confusing. They spread all over the book: Lilingtai is misspelled as Gao__tai, Hanma as Tingma, Pingyuanke as Pingzhuoke, Zhufo as Lunfo, Fengfo as Laifo, among others.
关 键 词:《敦煌诗集残卷辑考》 文字录校 疏误 核查原卷
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80