检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王建华[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学政治与行政管理系,江苏南京210093
出 处:《云南社会科学》2005年第1期109-113,共5页Social Sciences in Yunnan
基 金:2004年度南京大学人文社会科学研究项目的阶段性成果。
摘 要:在救亡图存的背景下,一切制度的移植,都必须贴上“国利民福”的标签,否则就没有生存的空间。为此,民初政治精英在移植西方政党理念的过程中,更多地融入了时代的价值取向。作为自由政府“固有灾祸”,以获取权力为首要目的的政党,变成了“国利民福”的载体,其掌握政权与否,“殊所不计”;本无优劣可言的政党制度,变成了一国政党之兴,只宜“两大对峙”。政治精英对政党理论的错误解读,使理想与现实、应然与实然间产生了巨大反差,加速了政党合法性的丧失。Under the background of saving the nation from extinction, any system transplanting must be attached a label as national interest and civil welfare; or else, it can't exist. Therefore, when politic elites in early Democratic Republic of China transplanted the theory of the west parties, they infused more values of the time. The party as inherent fatalities of the liberal government to obtain power changed into the carrier for national interest and civil welfare no matter whether it held the power or not. The system of party, regardless good or bad originally, became a favor among parties in the country, only dual party system was viable. Politic elites' misunderstanding on the theory of parties caused the tremendous contrast between ideality and reality, necessity and contingency; which accelerated the losing of the legitimacy of parties.
分 类 号:D693.741[政治法律—政治学] K258[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7