检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学人文与社会科学学院,江苏南京210016
出 处:《江南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2004年第6期19-23,共5页Journal of Jiangnan University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:文章通过学界对我国《合同法》第286条所规定权利的属性之争,提出了特种债权的优先权的概念,比较特种债权的优先权与法定留置权和法定抵押权等担保物权的区别,通过考察法国、日本两国的民法典以及我国法律中相关规定,归纳出特种债权的优先权的种类,研究其法律特征、效力和设定特种债权的优先权的基本理念和基本原则,指出我国相关规定的不足,提出了完善我国特种债权的优先权制度立法的建议。On the basis of the disputes about the nature of the right stipulated in article 286 of Law of the People's Republic of China on Contract, this paper advances the concept of the priority of special creditor's rights, and compares the differences among the priority of special creditor's rights, legal hypothecation and legal right of lien. By observing the civil codes of France and Japan and the relevant stipulations in China, the paper induces the kinds of the priority of special creditor's rights, and studies their respective legal features, effectiveness, the idea and the fundamental principle of enacting the priority of special creditor's rights. This paper then shows clearly the insufficiency of the relevant stipulations of China. In the end, the paper offers proposal about how to improve of the legislation covering the system of the priority of special creditor's rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.153