反思中西逻辑比较研究的前提性问题  

Reflections on the Problems of the Premise in the Contrastive Research of Chinese and Western Logic

作　　者：刘明明[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津财经学院经济系,天津300222

出　　处：《黔南民族师范学院学报》2004年第5期40-44,共5页Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities

摘　　要：自梁启超开启墨家论理学 (逻辑学 )研究以来 ,中西逻辑比较研究一直论争激烈 ,存在着片面“求同”和片面“求异”的思维取向 ,关键在于其“前提”的不真实、不充分。因此 ,只有认真反思中西逻辑比较研究的“前提性”问题 ,才能正确探讨各自的研究对象与个性 ,全理评价各自的长短及其人类性价值 。Since Liang Qichao started the research of Mohist logic, the debate on the contrastive research of Chinese and Western logic has always been heated, existing the orientation of one-sided pursuit between sameness and difference due to the untruth and scantiness of the premise. Therefore, the reflections on the problems of the premise in the contrastive research of Chinese and Western logic can provide the experience for reference in correctly discussing the objects and individuality of both studies, in reasonably appraising the advantages and disadvantages of them and the value for human beings, and in constructing the Chinese new culture.

关 键 词：反思 中西逻辑 比较研究 前提性问题 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]