检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学化学系,上海200092
出 处:《中国给水排水》2005年第1期45-48,共4页China Water & Wastewater
摘 要: 为探寻适合于活性炭纤维(ACFJ-10,ACFJ-12,ACFA-20)的微生物固定方法,对自然挂膜、活性污泥上清液挂膜、纯菌液挂膜的效果进行了比较。结果表明,ACFJ-12的挂膜效果最好,最佳的挂膜方式是纯菌液固定;ACFJ-12经上清液挂膜后的处理容量比自然挂膜的高17%,而采用纯菌液挂膜的容量则比自然挂膜的高45%,且出水水质稳定。In order to investigate the methods suitable for immobilization of microbe on activated carbon fibers (ACF J-10, ACF J-12, ACF A-20), comparison was made on the flow of raw water, circular flow of sludge supernatant liquor, and circular flow of bacteria solution, in which microbe was immobilized on ACFs. The result shows that ACF J-12 is the most efficient for microbe immobilized on, and bacteria solution is the best method for immobilization of microbe on ACFs. The treatment capacity of ACF J-12 in sludge supernatant liquor is 17% higher than that in raw water, while the capacity of ACF J-12 in bacteria solution is 45% higher than in raw water, with stable effluent quality.
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.224.98