检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严立[1] 刘志明[1] 陈建刚[1] 何圣兵[1] 吴德意[1] 孔海南[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院,上海200240
出 处:《中国给水排水》2005年第2期11-13,共3页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2003AA601040)
摘 要:比较了由砾石、沸石和粉煤灰填料组成的三级人工湿地与单级砾石人工湿地净化富营养化景观水体的效果.结果表明,三级人工湿地能逐级去除景观水体中的有机物、氮和磷,同时减轻出水氨臭现象.与单级湿地相比,三级湿地具有较好的脱氮除磷效果,对TP和TN的去除率分别达到35.1%~65.3%和28.7%~62.9%.两种湿地系统对COD的去除效果没有明显的区别(去除率分别为36.0%~79.8%和40.3%~61.9%),对浊度、蓝绿藻均有较好的去除效果(平均去除率分别达到78%和63%左右).Three-stage wetland was constructed by gravel, zeolite, and coal ash, and the single stage wetland was constructed only by gravel. The two kinds of wetland were compared for purification efficiency of scenic waters. The comparison shows that the three stage constructed wetland is capable of removing by stages the organic matters, nitrogen and phosphorus from scenic waters, and meanwhile it can abate ammoniacal odor from the effluent. As compared with the single stage wetland, the three-stage wetland has favorite nitrogen and phosphorus removal effect with removal rate of 35.1%- 65.3% and (28.7)%- 62.9% respectively for TP and TN. The two kinds of wetland are less different in COD removal (removal rate is 36.0%- 79.8% and 40.3%- 61.9% respectively). They are efficient in removal of turbidity and blue-green algae (average removal rate is about 78% and 63% respectively).
关 键 词:富营养化景观水体 三级人工湿地 单级人工湿地 脱氮除磷
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15