检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京林业大学,南京市210037 [2]江苏省水利厅,南京市210029
出 处:《水土保持通报》1993年第1期30-33,41,共5页Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
摘 要:该文着重研究了人工与机械两种不同清淤方式的堆土对土壤入渗率、地表径流、抗冲性、抗蚀性等土壤侵蚀因子的影响。指出:人工清淤的堆土,土壤入渗率高、地表径流少、抗冲抗蚀能力强,且土壤侵蚀强度小;而机械清淤则完全相反。同时还讨论了上述两种不同清淤方式的利弊和土地利用等问题。The influences of piled soil under artificial and mechanical silt-eliminating on soil erosion factorssuch as infiltrative ratio of soil, runoff,anti-erosibility and anti-scourability were mainly studied. Itwas pointed that the piled soil under artificial silt - eliminating has a higher soil inflitration, littlerunoff, greater ability of anti-erosibility and anti- scourability and little erosion intensity,But, thesecharactreistics of the piled soil under mechanical silt-eliminating are completely contrary to that onesunder artificial silt-eliminatipg .At last, the advantages and disadvantages and land use of the two dif-ferent ways were discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33