检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第88医院普外科,泰安271000
出 处:《中国实验动物学杂志》2000年第3期163-166,共4页Chinese Journal of Laboratory Animal Science
摘 要:目的 比较三种大鼠原位肝移植术式的特点。方法 采用“缝合法”、改良“三袖套法”和“背驮式”行大鼠原位肝移植180例。结果 “缝合法”无肝期平均为(16.6±6.3)min,手术成功率93.3%,一周存活率88.36%。“三袖套法”无肝期平均为(10.1±1.2)min,手术成功率93.3%,一周存活率86.7%。“背驮式”手术成功率90.0%,一周存活率85.0%。结论 无论何种方式的大鼠原位肝移植,只要能熟练掌握其操作要点,均可获得满意的成功率。The advantage in 3 different kinds of methods for orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT) technique in rats was compared. 180 cases of OLT in rats were conducted by 'suture', modified 'three-cuff' and 'piggyback' methods. The non-hepatic time was (16.6±6.3) min by 'suture', (10.1±1.2) min by modified 'three-cuff' methods. The successful rate and one-week survival rate for 'suture' were 93.3% and 88.3%, for modified 'three-cuff' were 93.3% and 86.7%, and for 'piggyback' were 90.0% and 85.0%, respectively. The findings were shown that a satisfactory result depends on the skill, no matter what kind of method you take.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171