检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王立诚[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学历史系,200433
出 处:《历史研究》2001年第2期69-82,共14页Historical Research
摘 要:两次鸦片战争期间 ,英国从最初在领事报关制度下协助清政府缉私 ,到取消协助缉私的条约义务 ,进而攫夺中国的海关行政权 ,改造海关和实现鸦片贸易合法化 ,其贯穿始终的核心目标是在通商口岸建立一种符合其利益的“法治” ,以保障其在不平等条约下的自由贸易。而清政府未能自主形成顺应新贸易格局的政府功能 ,结果将建立法治的政府职能以及相应的权益拱手送人 ,从而在“抚夷”的幻象下沦为列强的附庸。During the period between the two opium wars, Britain cooperated at first with the Qing government in suppressing smuggling under the consular customs procedure. Then it rescinded its treaty obligation in this regard and finally usurped the administration of Chinese customs to initiate the transformation of Chinese customs and legalize the opium trade. Their aim was to establish an order of “rule of law” to protect its interests at the treaty ports and ensure free trade under the conditions of privileges accorded to it by the unequal treaties. The Qing government failed to adapt to the new conditions and handed over its government functions in connection with the rule of law to the British, finally becoming dependent on the foreign powers under the illusion of “appeasing the barbarians.”
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3