近代学术转承:从国学到东方学——傅斯年《历史语言研究所工作之旨趣》解析  

A Turning Point of Modern Academic Studies: from National Learning to Oriental Studies——An Analysis of Fu Sinian's “Purpose of the Work of the Research Institute of History and Linguistics”

作　　者：桑兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学历史系,510275

出　　处：《历史研究》2001年第3期29-44,共16页Historical Research

摘　　要：傅斯年的《历史语言研究所工作之旨趣》作为近代中国学术转折的标志 ,主要针对前此占据学术主流的章太炎门生。傅氏虽然提出历史学只是史料学之类的极端口号 ,但所主张的内容和路径与北京大学国学门的趋向一脉相承。其贡献在于 ,坐言之外迅速起行 ,以新机构聚集一批志同道合者 ,在考古等领域很快取得超越前人的成绩。不过 ,只找材料不读书的偏激 ,脱离学术正轨。受此影响 ,学术主流难免走上窄而偏的狭境 ,导致学术界长期陷入派分的纠葛。As a turning point of academic studies in modern China Fu Sinians “Purpose of the Work of the Research Institute of History and Linguistics” was aimed at the followers of Zhang Taiyan who represented the academic main stream. Although Fu Sinian put forward a number of radical slogans such as “Historiography is nothing but collection of historical materials,” what was in his mind and his approach were identical with those of the school of Guoxuemen (the Gate of Chinese National Culture) of the Peking University. His contribution was that he promptly put his words into actions and, gathering together a group of people with the same ideals into his new organization, outstanding achievements were soon achieved in archaeology and other fields. However, a one sided emphasis on the discovery of new historical materials and the neglect of research led them astray from the proper road of academic studies. Under the impact of this school the mainstream school became more firmly stuck in its narrow road, and entire academic circles got bogged down in sectional disputes.

关 键 词：历史语言研究所 国学 傅斯年 学术 历史学 考古 史料学 偏激 主流 转折 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]