检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学声学研究所近代声学国家重点实验室,南京210093 [2]东南大学机械工程系,南京210096
出 处:《系统仿真学报》2005年第2期479-482,487,共5页Journal of System Simulation
摘 要:描述液压系统动态特性的微分方程组一般具有高度非线性和病态性,通常所采用定步长四阶 Rung-Kutta (R-K)算法的 DSHW 仿真软件,为了达到高的仿真精度,在仿真积分时必须取很小的步长,这增加了仿真计算的时间。研究编制了变步长四阶 R-K 法和变步长 Gill 法的算法程序,将三种算法的仿真计算收敛速度和计算精度进行了比较。结果表明,变步长四阶 R-K 法收敛速度最快,变步长 Gill 法计算精度最高。Due to that the differential equations of describing hydraulic systems is highly nonlinear and stiff. DSHW simulation software of a 4 -order Rung-Kutta method with fixed step is always utilized. For getting satisfied precision, the step must be taken in very small, and thus the calculation time is increased. Therefore the precision and time of simulation must be considered. The 4-order Rung-Kutta method and 4-order Gill method both with changeable step are studied. Comparing the calculation precision and convergence speed of three integral algorithms described above, it can be seen that the 4-order Rung-Kutta method with changeable step only needs the shortest time to make the differential equations to be convergent and the 4-order Gill method with changeable step has the highest precision in simulation. The development of the algorithm enhances the functions of simulation software.
分 类 号:TG315.4[金属学及工艺—金属压力加工]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.66