论行纪合同委托人的取回权  

作　　者：其木提[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2005年第1期108-114,共7页Global Law Review

摘　　要：我国《合同法》引入类似英美法的间接代理制度后,学界对行纪与代理之间的关系提出了很多观点。本文在整理不同法系代理制度,区分行纪与间接代理的基础上,主张在行纪人破产时,在委托人和行纪人或其债权人之间的关系上,委托人对委托物应享有取回权或享有优先于一般债权人的权利。After the introduction into the Chinese Contract Law of an undisclosed principal system similar to that in Anglo American law, many different viewpoints have been put forward by Chinese scholars on the difference between commission and undisclosed principal. On the basis of analyzing the agency system in different legal systems and distinguishing the difference between commission and undisclosed principal, the author claims that the consigner should be given the retrieval right on consigned goods so as to ensure the independence of the commission system in China.

关 键 词：取回权 行纪人 间接代理 行纪合同 委托人 英美法 一般债权 破产 分行 法系 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]