穴位埋线与天灸治疗变应性鼻炎近期疗效对比分析  

Comparison of short-term therapeutic effects of acupoint catgut embedding and crude herb moxibustion on allergic rhinitis

作　　者：郭元琦[1] 陈丽仪[2] 张世平[2] 

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学第二临床医学院,广东510120 [2]暨南大学医学院第四附属医院

出　　处：《中国针灸》2004年第12期828-830,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

摘　　要：目的 :对比穴位埋线及三伏天天灸治疗变应性鼻炎的近期疗效。方法 :将 72例患者随机分为埋线组和天灸组各 36例 ,于夏季的初伏、中伏、中伏加强、末伏这 4天进行治疗 ,埋线组取肺俞、迎香 ,天灸组取风门、肺俞、脾俞、肾俞穴位贴敷治疗。治疗结束后 1 0天统计疗效。结果 :埋线组显效 1 3例、有效 2 2例、无效 1例 ,天灸组分别为 5例、2 1例和 1 0例 ,两组疗效经统计学处理差异有非常显著性意义 (P <0 0 1 )。结论 :穴位埋线对变应性鼻炎有良好效果 ,近期疗效优于天灸疗法。Objective To compare the short-term therapeutic effects of acupoint catgut embedding (ACE) and crude herb moxibustion (CHM) on allergic rhinitis in the dog days. Methods Seventy-two cases were randomly selected and divided into ACE group and CHM group (control group), 36 cases in each group. The patients were treated in the four hotest days in the summer, i.e. the first dog-day, the second dog-day, the consolidating day of the second dog-day and the last dog-day. Feishu (BL 13) and Yingxiang (LI 20) were used in the ACE group and Fengmen (BL 12), Feishu (BL 13), Pishu (BL 20) and Shenshu (BL 23) were used in the CHM group. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were assessed 10 days after the end of treatment. Results Thirteen cases and 5 cases were markedly effective, 22 and 21 were effective, and 1 and 10 were ineffective in the ACE group and the control group, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the therapeutic effect (P<0.01). Conclusion Acupoint catgut embedding has a good therapeutic effect on allergic rhinitis, with the short-term therapeutic effect better than that of crude herb moxibustion.

关 键 词：治疗 天灸 穴位埋线 变应性鼻炎 近期疗效 肺俞 对比分析 脾俞 肾俞穴 经统计学处理 

分 类 号：R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R765[医药卫生—中医临床基础]