检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新乡医学院附属第三医院,河南新乡453003
出 处:《现代临床护理》2005年第1期61-62,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨采用两种皮内进针角度进行青霉素皮试对病人产生的痛感、一次注射成功率及阳性反应的影响。方法随机将300例住院病人分为常规组和观察组,常规组150例采用传统的皮内注射方法进行青霉素皮试,观察组150例采用针尖斜面向下皮内注射法皮试,观察两组病人的疼痛反应、一次注射成功率及阳性反应。结果两组病人疼痛反应及一次注射成功率比较均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用针尖斜面向下皮试法明显优于常规皮试法,其疼痛反应轻且一次注射成功率高。Objective To investigate the impact of two methods of subcutaneous injections on sense of pain, rate of success in one time and positive reaction of patients with penicillin skin test. Methods Three hundred patients were randomly divided into the routine group and the study group. Traditional subcutaneous injections were applied to penicillin skin test for patients in the routine group. Pinpoint inclined plane downward subcutaneous injections were applied to penicillin skin test for patients in the study group. The reaction of pain, one-time success rate of injection and positive reaction were compared. Result There were significant differences of reaction of pain and one-time success rate of injection between these two groups. Conclusion Application of pinpoint inclined plane downward subcutaneous injection is superior to the routine injection method in terms of reactions of pain and one-time success rate of injection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3