“仁”在日本近代史观中的非主流地位  

Ren: A Marginalized Concept in Modern Japanese View of History

作　　者：韩东育[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,教授130024

出　　处：《历史研究》2005年第1期142-155,共14页Historical Research

摘　　要：中日两国间的根本分歧是历史观的分歧。与中国传统的道德史观不同,滥觞于江户时期的日本近代史观,具有鲜明的道德排斥特征和实力崇尚主义倾向。以“仁”为核心的儒家道德标准的降诸次位,决定了日本人的历史认识方法、历史编纂原则甚至国家体制走向。值得注意的是,日本近代史观的形成,既有日本传统哲学的作用,更有江户时期反朱子学的思想巨变所带来的基调性影响。它解释了何以明治维新不时被称为“反革命”运动,而“万世一系”的国体传统也并非悉数决定于“皇国”史观的深层原因。At the very heart of Sino-Japanese conflicts lies the disparity in their views of history. The modern Japanese view of history originated in the Edo period. Unlike the traditional Chinese moralistic view of history, the modern Japanese view of history is marked by a rejection of morality and the worship of strength. Confucian moral standards characterized by “ren”(humaneness) were marginalized, and this determined Japanese understanding of and writings on history, and even the orientation of state institutions. It should be noted that the modern Japanese view of history is a result not only of the gradual development of traditional Japanese philosophy but, to an even greater extent, of the fierce intellectual revolt against Zhu Xi's (Chu Hsi) philosophy in the Edo period. With this in mind, we can see why the Meiji Reform is frequently described as a “counter-revolutionary” movement, and gain a deeper understanding of the statement that the traditional Japanese state system based on the notion of “the ever-lasting single bloodline” is not solely determined by their view of their country as an empire.

关 键 词：历史观 近代史 历史编纂 历史认识 明治维新 革命 国家体制 国体 道德 根本 

分 类 号：K093.13[历史地理—历史学]