检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈永翀[1] 李世斌 王素娥[3] 郝世平[3] 黄真桂 张祖奇
机构地区:[1]中国烧伤创疡科技中心,北京100053 [2]广西柳州钢铁集团医院,广西柳州545002 [3]河北廊坊市烧烫伤专科医院,河北廊坊065000
出 处:《中国烧伤创疡杂志》2005年第1期37-40,共4页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
摘 要:目的 :探寻一种更利于供皮区创面修复的方法。方法 :应用皮肤再生医疗技术 (MEBT/MEBO)处理植皮手术供皮区创面 6 7例 (A组 ) ,与传统凡士林纱布处理供皮区 71例 (B组 ) ,在术后疼痛、愈合时间、愈合质量上进行比较分析。结果 :皮肤再生医疗技术治疗组在愈合时间、愈合质量与凡士林治疗组比较均有显著性差异 (P <0 0 1)。结论 :皮肤再生医疗技术能实现薄皮片和中厚皮片供皮区创面皮肤生理性再生修复、提高皮肤愈合质量、减少瘢痕增生等作用。Objective: To find a good method for the repair of the wounds in skin donor site. Method: 67 patients with wounds in the skin donor site were treated with skin regeneration medical technique (MEBT/MEBO) and 71 patients of the same wounds were treated with vaseline gauze. The results were compared. Result: skin regeneration medical technique (MEBT/MEBO) was superior to Vaseline treatment in terms of wound healing time, healing quality and scar formation. The difference between the 2 treatments was significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: Skin regeneration medical technique (MEBT/MEBO) can achieve wound skin physiological regenerative repair with thin and moderate thick skin grafts and promote the quality of wound healing, and reduce scar formation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16