检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈志萍[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省济宁市第一人民医院儿科,山东济宁272011
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2003年第7期586-587,共2页Journal of Nurses Training
摘 要:目的观察新生儿四肢静脉与头皮静脉留置套管针的差别。方法将 10 0例住院新生儿随机分为四肢静脉留置组 (4 0例 )与头皮静脉留置组 (6 0例 ) ,分别观察两组新生儿静脉穿刺一次成功率及留置时间情况。结果两组静脉穿刺一次成功率 χ2 =0 .15 ,P >0 .0 5 ;留置时间比较 χ2 =0 .6 1,P >0 .0 5 ,差异无显著意义。结论对于颅内出血的新生儿 ,为了减少搬动头部、防止加重颅内出血 ,可首选在患儿四肢留置套管针。Objective To study the different for indwelling catheter between neonate limb vein and scalp vein. Method 100 cases inpatient neonate were randomly divided into limb vein group (40 cases ) and scalp vein group (60 cases ), the achieving rate for only- one vein puncture and retain time for the two group were observed. Result compared with two group ,there is no significant difference ( the achieving rate for only-one vein puncture χ 2=0.15, P >0.05, retain time χ 2=0.61 P >0.05 ). Conclusion To reduce head moving and protect aggravating intracanial hemorrhage, for neonate with intracanial hemorrhage, the first selection will be indwelling catheter in limb vein.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147