检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2004年第2期133-138,共6页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:在受教育者 (学生 )跨国受教育权的实现方面 ,欧洲法院的司法判例创建了两条线索 :职业培训———教育准入———平等对待 ;工作者———社会福利———平等对待。两条线路异曲同工 ,都建设性地扩展了学生在异国享有平等受教育的权利 ,从而实现了欧盟范围内教育资源的共享。而新的欧盟公民平等对待观开辟了一个资源共享的新天地 ,它直接赋予了欧盟公民在欧共体条约中的权利 ,其中包括欧共体条约第 12条平等对待的权利。In order to realize students′transnational educational rights, through its case-law, the European Court of Justice has created two routes, namely vocational training-access to education-equal treatment route and workers-social advantages-equal treatment route. Two routes serve one purpose. In a constructive way, they have expanded students′equal educational rights in a host Member State. Both routes are also constructive in promoting students′ rights to equal access to non-national education. The fresh Union citizen-equal treatment argument is really making every national of Member States open his/her eyes. It has directly conferred Union citizen his/her rights under the Treaty Establishing the European Community, including equal rights under EC Article 12 that prohibits discrimination on grounds of nationality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28