中外刑事赔偿归责原则之比较研究  

A Comparative Study on Chinese and Overseas Attribution Principles for Criminal Compensations

作　　者：周樨平[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京广播电视大学,江苏南京210029

出　　处：《河北法学》2003年第1期129-133,共5页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：世界上多数国家对司法裁决错误的赔偿 (冤狱赔偿 )采用无过失责任原则 ,而对非司法裁决错误的职务侵权赔偿采用过错或者违法原则。我国没有区分这二者的区别 ,采用的是以违法责任为主兼采无过失责任的归责原则体系。要完善刑事赔偿归责原则 ,应借鉴其他国家的立法经验。Most states over the world adopt attribution principle of non-negligence in compensations for erroneous judgments, and attribution principle of negligence or breach of law in compensations for duty torts resulting from non-judicial rule mistakes. There is no difference between them in China, who mainly adopts attrition principle system of breach of law, and non-negligence principle at the same time. China should learn legislative experiences from other countries for perfecting Chinese attribution principle of criminal compensations.

关 键 词：归责原则 刑事赔偿 司法裁决 违法原则 违法责任 无过失责任原则 职务侵权 世界 国家 借鉴 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D922[政治法律—法学]