我国合同立法对预期违约和不安抗辩权制度的取舍研究  

The Research of the Choice Between Anticipatory Breach of Contract and the System of Inassured Pleading of Contract in China' s Contract legislation

作　　者：汪毅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《河北法学》2002年第B11期54-57,共4页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：对“期前违约”行为,1999年《合同法》兼采了预期违约和不安抗辩权制度。两种制度有重合之处,且各有利弊,如何取舍?通过对两种制度的差异进行优劣评析,认为我国合同立法应以预期违约制度为修改方向,并提出若干修改建议。The Contract Law, 1999 adopts the system of anticipatory breach of contract and the system of Einrede der Vnsichcrkeit as to 'breach of contract before the period of performance'. The two systems have the sameness and both have the advantages and the disadvantages, then how to do the selection? Through analyzing and commenting the advantages and the disadvantages of the discrepancies of the two systems, the writer holds that the legislation of contract in China should regard the system of anticipatory breach of contract as the direction of revision, and put forward some revision suggestions.

关 键 词：预期违约制度 不安抗辩权制度 合同立法 取舍 《合同法》 99年 中国 评析 修改建议 方向 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学] G633[政治法律—法学]