检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晓辉[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2002年第B11期71-74,共4页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:在专利侵权诉讼中,最富有挑战性的难题莫过于“等同原则”的适用。如何在为专利权人提供充分保护的同时,较好地发挥法律对公众的通知公告作用,继而有效地促进科学发展和技术进步,这是我们在适用该原则时应当首先考虑的问题。近年来,我国法院在实践中也经常遇到等同侵权的案件,但由于法官的经验不足,加之这一方面学界理论研究的滞后,使得该原则的适用还存在许多问题。The application of 'Equality Principle' is the most challenging problem in the lawsuit for patent in-friengement. How to give the patentee sufficient protection and bring the legal public announcement into full play , is the frist question we should take into consideration, which will promote the development of the science and technology. In rescent years, our judge often encounter such cases in practice, but they have no sufficient experience. At the same time, because of the backward theoretical reaseach many problems arise.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28