检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学国际法研究所
出 处:《中国法学》2002年第6期155-168,共14页China Legal Science
摘 要:在分析研究了美国法院将传统长臂管辖权理论运用于网络案件的有关实践后 ,作者指出 :尽管网络案件有其特殊之处 ,对传统的管辖权提出了一定的挑战 ,但不应夸大其对传统管辖权的冲击 ,传统的管辖权规则仍可适用于网络案件 ;就网络案件管辖权模式而言 ,强调物理联系因素的欧洲模式难堪重任 ,而强调被告是否与法院地间形成了某种程度的联系 ,根据企业所使用的语言、货币、法律选择、拒绝交易声明以及实施特定交易等 ,考察被告的活动是否针对法院地 ,是否与法院地形成了某种“有意利用”关系的美国模式更符合管辖权模式的未来发展趋势。On the basis of analyzing the application of long-arm jurisdiction to internet cases by the U.S. courts, the authors suggest: firstly, though internet cases have their own characteristics and challenge the traditional rules of jurisdiction, the challenge itself should not be overestimated, and the traditional rules are still applicable to internet cases; Secondly, as regard to the model of jurisdiction of internet cases, the European model which emphasizes on the physical location is hard to make voice to the challenge, and the American model which lays stress on the contacts between the defendant and the court is more appropriate to the future development. In this model, the U. S. courts will look to the language and the currency chosen by the enterprise, the choice of law clause, the disclaimer clause and the performance of specific transaction and so on, analyzing whether the activities of defendant target the place of the court and constitute the purposeful availment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222