检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李佩忠[1] 黄选兆[1] 项济生[1] 乐建新[1]
机构地区:[1]同济医科大学附属协和医院耳鼻咽喉科
出 处:《临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志》1994年第5期262-264,共3页Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology
摘 要:应用主动性前鼻测压法比较了运动和鼻粘膜减充血剂对鼻气道阻力(NAR)的影响。结果:在正常成人和慢性单纯性鼻炎病人中,鼻粘膜减充血剂均较运动对NAR的作用更强,运动对NAR的作用仅维持不到半小时,且有反射性充血现象发生,而鼻粘膜减充血剂对NAR的作用可维持3小时以上,无反射性充血现象发生。提示在评价NAR时,如需对鼻粘膜减充血,而且所需时间较长时,则鼻腔应选用鼻粘膜减充血剂,而不要选用运动的方法。The effect of both physical exercise and nasal decongestant on NAR was compared using active anterior rhinomanometry. The results showed that nasal decongestion can be achieved by the use of nasal decongestant more powerful than that of by physical exercise in normal adults and patients with chronic simple rhinititis. The effect of physical exercise on NAR only maintained less than 30 minutes and reflective congestion appeared. The effect of nasal decongestant on NAR could maintain more than 3 hours without any reflective congestion. The results revealed that when NAR needs to be evaluated,decongestant should be selected rather than exercise.
分 类 号:R765.250.2[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28