不同导联系统记录体表心室碎裂电位效果对比研究  

A Contrast Study of Effects of Recording Body Surface Ventricular Fractionated Potentials With Three Different Lead Systems.

作　　者：张社华[1] 董果雄[1] 杨泰生[1] 范洪亮[1] 修运强[1] 任桂芝[1] 陈厚侠 朱震[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛医学院,青岛266021

出　　处：《生物医学工程学杂志》1994年第4期330-334,共5页Journal of Biomedical Engineering

摘　　要：本文分别应用标准12导联系统、Frank正交导联系统和改良Frank正交导联系统记录健康人36例、陈旧性心肌梗塞42例的心室碎裂电位(VFP),通过分析这些导联系统中相互垂直或近似垂直的导联上VFP的形态、数量关系,发现用改良Frank正交导联系统记录VFP较其它导联系统更科学、合理,且操作方便。The body surface ventricular fractionated potentials of 36 normal subjects, 42 healed myocar-dial infarct patients were recorded with the standard 12 lead, Frank perpendicular lead and reformed Frank perpendicular lead systems separately, ventricular fractionated potentia (VFP) By analysing the forms and the numral relations of perpendicular or approximately perpendiculer in the leads, we found that the reformed Frank perpendicular lead system is more scientific, practical and simple than other lead systems for recording VFP.

关 键 词：体表 心室碎裂电位 导联系统 

分 类 号：R318.03[医药卫生—生物医学工程]