再谈“‘五四’文学革命”与“两个翅膀论”  

More on the "Literary Revolution of the May Fourth Movement " and the " Two Wings theory"

作　　者：袁良骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院研究生院文学系

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2005年第1期80-84,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：以“鸳蝴派”为代表的民国旧小说表面上继承了中国传统小说的衣钵,但从总体上说,它属于中国传统文学的强驽之末,从形式到内容,它已经远远不能适应新的时代需要了。“五四”文学先驱所以要对它大力扫荡,正是基于这一点。而“五四”新文学所以能取而代之,也正是因为这一点。这是不以任何个人意志为转移的历史规律,这就是中国现代文学史。至于以“两个翅膀”之名来攻击“五四”文学革命,给“五四”文学革命抹黑,就更是螳臂当车了。The old novels of Nationalist China represented by the sentimentalist genre inherit superficially the mantle of China' s traditional novels. On the whole, they are of the spent force of traditional literature. This is the very reason why the pioneers of the May 4th Movement tried to sweep them away and replace them with the new literature. This is the law of history unchangeable to the will of individuals and this is the modern history of Chinese literature As for the attacks on and blackening of the May 4th literary revolution made in the name of the 'two wings theory' are nothing but a mantis trying to stop a chariot Their form and content are far from being able to suit the need of the new age.

关 键 词：“五四”运动 新文学运动 “鸳鸯蝴蝶派” 现代文学 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]