检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任祖荣[1]
出 处:《江苏广播电视大学学报》2005年第1期81-84,共4页Journal of Jiangsu Radio & Television University
摘 要:我国《继承法》没有对共同遗嘱作明文规定,但实践中共同遗嘱却大量存在,表现为形式意义上的共同遗嘱与实质意义上的共同遗嘱两类,而只有实质意义上的共同遗嘱才具法律意义。学术界对共同遗嘱有着不同的态度,其根本原因在于这种遗嘱本身利弊兼存。从我国继承法律制度发展方向以及民间实际做法的角度看,应以承认共同遗嘱法律效力为宜。由于共同遗嘱的特殊性和复杂性,司法实践中应根据共同遗嘱的不同内容采取不同的解决办法。Although there is no statute concerning mutual testament in the inheritance law of our country, the mutual testaments can be found frequently in reality. There are two kinds of mutual testaments in forms: formal ones and substantial ones. And only substantial ones are lawfully effective. There are different opinions about mutual testaments among legists because this kind of testament may has both positive and negative results. Considering the developing trend of Chinese inheritance law and the actual practice, the mutual testaments should be granted lawfully. Due to the particularity and complexity of mutual testament, different solutions should adopted according to different contents in the testament.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30