侵害债权制度法律性质考察  

Analysis of the Legal Nature of Encroachment of Obligatory Rights

作　　者：佟强[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《现代法学》2005年第2期85-91,共7页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：债的相对性原则对保护个人自由的作用卓有成效。但随着人类社会化程度提高,相互依赖性增强,限制个人自由滥用的客观要求日益迫切。为顺应上述社会需要,应突破债的相对性原则,建立侵害债权制度。基于传统债法理论的一些观点没有且无法真正反映该制度的本质,债权物权化理论才是解释该制度唯一可行的观点。The relativity of obligatory rights is largely effective to protect an individual’s freedom. However, with the socialization of human activities and enhancement of men’s mutual reliance, there appears an urgent appeal for a restriction of personal freedom. This paper determines that to meet such a social demand, the relativity of financial obligation should be broken up and a regime concerning encroachment of obligatory rights set up. Given traditional obligation-law doctrines have not or cannot reveal the essence of this regime, this author points out that only when we extent obligatory rights to rights in rem can we use such a doctrine to interpret whole issues in this regime.

关 键 词：侵害债权制度 相对性原则 个人自由 债法 法理 法律性质 客观要求 相互依赖性 物权化 理论 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]