检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘慎沛[1] 崔武任[1] 李建华[1] 叶维新[1] 方唯一[2] 魏文华[2]
机构地区:[1]同济医科大学实验医学研究中心核医学研究室 [2]同济医科大学附属同济医院放射免疫室
出 处:《同济医科大学学报》1989年第1期42-45,共4页Acta Universitatis Medicinae Tongji
摘 要:采用本室建立的可磁化固相二抗 (DAMP) 分离技术与常规应用的双抗体法,聚乙二醇(PEG)法、活性炭法对10种RIA药盒进行实验比较。结果显示DAMP法与双抗体法的五项质控指标均在RIA质控标准的最佳范围内,明显优于PEG法与活性炭法,表明DAMP法具有双抗体法的分离效果,且较双抗体法更为简便、快速,适合用作RIA的通用分离方法。An experiment was conducted with ten kinds of RIA Kit to compare separation technique based on solid phase double antibody magnitizable particle (DAMP) with common methods of double antibody, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and charcoal. It was found that the five quality control indices for DAMP method and double anti body method are within the scope of RIA quality control standard, and that DAMP method has the same separating effect as double antibody method. However, the former is simpler and more rapid than the latter. As a result, it is suitabe for universal separation in RIA.
分 类 号:R371-33[医药卫生—病原生物学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.66