离婚诉权不平等之检讨——兼评我国《婚姻法》第34条  

Questioning of Being Unequal to the Parties' Cause of Action to Divorce

作　　者：张加文 李胜华 

机构地区：中南财经政法大学,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《贵州省政法管理干部学院学报》2002年第1期41-44,共4页Journal of Guizhou Political-Legal Cadre College

摘　　要：男女离婚诉松平等是平等的要求。在妇女怀孕期间、分娩后一年内和中止妊娠后六个月内限制男方离婚诉权不利于对女方、男方、子女权益和社会整体利益的保护，也违背了婚烟法自身体系的一致性，其实施效果也极差；它是计划经济体制下漠视诉权、固守传统婚恋观念、固守厌讼观念的产物。《婚姻法》第34条应废除。The equality of the husband and wife in the cause of action to divorce is the requirement of the equality of man and woman. It's harmful to protect the interests of wife, husband, child and the society as a whole to restrain the husband's cause of action to divorce during the period of his spouse's pregnancy, within one year after protection and within six months after the suspend of pregnancy, which also violates the coherence of the system of Marriage Law, producing very bad effect of enforcement, and which is the product of ignorance of cause of action, adherent to the traditional opinions on marriage and disliking litigation under the system of planned economy. The artiele 34 of Chinese Marriage Law should be abolished.

关 键 词：诉权 《婚姻法》 离婚 婚烟法 子女权益 婚恋观念 社会整体利益 男女 检讨 要求 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学] D925[政治法律—法学]