机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院第一附属医院内科,515041 [2]汕头龙湖人民医院内科
出 处:《中华结核和呼吸杂志》2005年第2期88-92,共5页Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
基 金:广东省科委资助项目(2003C33714)
摘 要:目的 探讨小剂量布地奈德粉吸入剂(商品名:普米克都保)长期吸入治疗轻度支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)的远期疗效和不良反应。方法将52例轻度哮喘患者分为3组。吸入糖皮质激素组(A组)22例:每晚吸入布地奈德粉吸入剂200μg。口服糖皮质激素组(B组)15例:在哮喘发作期给予泼尼松5mg每天1次口服,茶碱控释片(商品名:舒弗美)0.2g每天2次口服;沙丁胺醇(商品名:喘乐宁)气雾剂2揿(每揿100μg)每天3次吸入。非糖皮质激素组(C组)15例:发作期只给茶碱控释片0.2g每天2次口服,沙丁胺醇气雾剂2揿每天3次吸入。全部病例连续治疗3年,停药后随访1年。在此4年间,检测各组患者治疗前、后一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)、气道阻力(Raw)、气道传导率(Gaw)、气道高反应性(BHR)、临床疗效、血浆皮质醇浓度以及促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)刺激后的反应等。结果 (1)治疗前A、B、C3组绝大多数病例的BHR均在3—4级,分别为91%(20/22)、100%(15/15)、93%(14/15)。治疗后A组18例(82%)转为1—2级;B组13例(87%)仍为3~4级;C组15例(100%)病例为3~5级。A、B、C3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。(2)A、B、C3组Raw治疗前分别为(623±103)%、(605±90)%、(638±108)%,治疗后分别为(158±24)%、(340±61)%、(420±81)%,3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。(3)A、B、C3组Gaw治疗前分别为(22±4)%、(27±6)%、(27±5)%,治疗后分别为(83±15)%、(42±9)%、(31±6)%,3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。(4)A组FEV.治疗前、后分别为(2.3±0.4)、(2.9±0.4)L,B组为(2.3±0.4)、(2.6±0.4)L,C组为(2.3±0.4)、(2.7±0.4)L。3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。(5)以哮喘症状被控制作为疗效标准,A、B、C3组有效率分别为91%、530%,和330%,3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。(6)A、B组治疗前、�Objective To investigate the long term efficacy as well as the side-effects of small dose budesonide turbuhaler in mild bronchial asthma. Methods Fifty-two patients with mild asthma were randomly divided into groups A,B and C. Twenty-two cases in group A received 200 μg budesonide turbuhaler by inhalation every night. Fifteen cases in group B received oral prednisone 5 mg/d and theophyllin control release tablet 0.2 g twice daily,as well as ventolin aerosol inhalation 200 μg three times daily during asthmatic attack. Fifteen cases in group C received no glucocorticoids,but theophyllin control release tablet 0.2 g twice daily as well as ventolin aerosol inhalation(200 μg/d) were given during asthmatic attack. All three groups received treatment consecutively for 3 years,and followed for one year after stopping treatment. During the total 4 years,pulmonary function measurements(FEV 1,Raw,Gaw),bronchial hyperreactivity(BHR),clinical effects,plasma cortisol level and the activated reaction of ACTH were evaluated. Results (1)Before the treatment,BHR of the three groups were similar,with most cases graded Ⅲ-Ⅳ,being 91%(20/22),100%(15/15) and 93%(14/15) respectively. After the treatment,the BHR of 18(82%) cases of group A was reduced to grades Ⅰ-Ⅱ. However,13 cases (87%) of group B still remained at grades Ⅲ-Ⅳ and 15 cases (100%) of group C were still at grades Ⅲ-Ⅳ. The results of the three groups showed a significant difference(P<0.01). (2)Compared to measurements before the treatment,Raw was (623±103)% s (158±24)% in group A,(605±90)% s (340±61)% in group B,and (638±108)% s (420±81)% in group C,the difference among the three groups being significant(P<0.01). (3)Compared to the measurements before the treatment,Gaw was (22±4)% s (83±15)% in group A,(27±6)% s (42±9)% in group B,and (27±5)% s (31±6)% in group C,the difference among the three groups being significant(all P<0.01 respectiely). (4)Compared with the measurements before the treatment,FE 1 was (2.3±0.4)L s (2.9±0.4)L in
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...